Radar data can help protect birds from wind turbines

• Researchers at WSL used weather radars to track bird migrations in real time and assess the risk of collisions with wind turbines.
• Targeted shutdowns during peak bird migration periods could prevent many collisions.
• This would result in only a minimal loss of electricity generation.

To address these challenges, the team led by biodiversity researcher Silke Bauer of the WSL uses data from weather radars distributed across the continent. They normally measure precipitation and cloud density in the atmosphere. However, these radar systems also track the movements of flocks of birds—and cover much larger areas than specialized bird radars. In addition, weather radar data is available at high spatial and temporal resolution, with measurements taken approximately every 15 minutes.

In the latest study, published in Nature Sustainability, the research team analyzed weather radar data from Germany, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg. These countries are home to approximately 42,000 wind turbines, which generated about 718 petajoules of energy in 2018—the study’s base year—equivalent to roughly the annual output of 18 nuclear power plants. Using data from 37 weather radars and complex statistical analyses, the researchers estimated the number of birds that could potentially have collided with the rotor blades in 2018. On average, nearly 800 birds per turbine were considered at risk.

The researchers then modeled various shutdown scenarios designed to prevent either 50 or 90 percent of potential collisions. In one scenario, the turbines were shut down during the period of peak bird migration. In the second scenario, the turbines stopped whenever the bird density in the surrounding area exceeded a certain threshold. In the third scenario, the turbines shut down when the number of potential collisions per kilowatt-hour of electricity generated exceeded a defined limit.

The first two scenarios are less attractive to operators because they reduce electricity production by 2 to 20 percent, depending on the bird protection goals. In the third scenario, however, operators would lose only 1.2 or 7.6 percent of their electricity—surprisingly little given the study’s rather rough assumptions. “Surprisingly efficient compromises are possible, with only minimal loss of energy production,” notes Bauer. She now wants to extend the calculations to cover all of Europe and longer time periods.

The biannual bird migration is an important part of biodiversity. Since the majority of migration takes place within a relatively narrow time window and the peaks of these movements are concentrated in relatively short phases, time-limited and thus cost-effective restrictions on wind power production could suffice. According to the researchers, this is most likely to be achieved through cross-border regulations and coordination—both to protect migratory birds and to meet climate targets.

“Many people oppose wind turbines because they believe they kill a huge number of birds,” says Bauer. “I want to reconcile sustainable energy production with bird conservation and demonstrate that there are strategies to reduce the number of birds at risk.”