Digital transformation of spatial planning
Digital planning is not simply the introduction of new tools into an otherwise stable profession. It can transform what planners see, what can be compared or calculated, which actors are able to intervene, and where professional discretion and responsibility are located.
Within DISCLOSE, I investigate the sociotechnical infrastructures through which land-use planning is increasingly conducted. My research follows planning technologies across software development, consultancy, procurement, implementation, professional events, and everyday planning practice. Particular attention is given to the relationships among public planning authorities, technology providers, consultants, researchers, and other intermediaries.
The research addresses questions such as:
How do digital platforms and software systems reorganise planning knowledge and professional practice?
How are particular technologies presented and legitimised as solutions to planning problems?
How do classifications, interfaces, models, and data standards shape what can be represented and acted upon?
Where do judgement, accountability, and authority move when planning processes become digitally mediated?
How do planning cultures and institutional settings influence the adoption and use of digital technologies?
Urban digitalisation and the politics of expertise
My earlier research examined the development of Smart City Vienna. Through ethnographic research, policy analysis, and interviews with planners, policymakers, technology developers, and citizens, I studied how smart-city imaginaries, participatory initiatives, and intelligent infrastructures reconfigured urban governance.
This work showed that urban technologies do not merely implement political objectives. They participate in defining urban problems, constructing publics, allocating responsibilities, and establishing particular versions of desirable urban futures. My publications have developed concepts including urban imaginaries as tacit governing devices, infrastructuring citizenry, and mundane AI oversight.
Citizen science and alternative knowledge practices
I study citizen science as an urban knowledge infrastructure through which residents, technologies, scientific institutions, and public authorities encounter one another. My research examines both the democratic possibilities of citizen-generated knowledge and the institutional frictions that arise when participatory data enter established systems of expertise and decision-making.
Research conducted in Siena investigated how citizen-science initiatives produce forms of urban belonging while also encountering difficulties in eliciting meaningful institutional responses. Related work examines how alternative knowledge practices can challenge, supplement, or become incorporated into dominant arrangements of urban governance.
Multispecies urbanism and environmental governance
My work on multispecies urbanism investigates cities as environments shared among humans, animals, plants, fungi, technologies, institutions, and ecological processes. I am particularly interested in how nonhuman life becomes represented within planning, legal, scientific, and civic practices.
This research brings STS into conversation with anthropology, political ecology, environmental humanities, and multispecies ethnography. It asks how ecological expertise is produced, how care becomes organised, and how planning and governance might become more responsive to forms of urban life that exceed exclusively human interests.